Gong-gam is proud of its litigation portfolio and its successes in promoting and protecting the rights of women. Gong-gam is proud of its litigation portfolio and its successes in promoting and protecting the rights of women.
In one case, we represented a female military officer who, after having been sexually harassed by a male superior officer, was brought before a military tribunal for insubordination. While the female officer was found guilty by the tribunal, we appealed the case to the Military High Court where we were successful in overturning the insubordination conviction. We are now active in working towards policy changes within the military which would identify and eliminate the harmful effects of sexual harassment and discrimination against women.
A Chinese woman in a domestic violence action
Women from the Philippines who sued their employer for forcing them into prostitution
A Vietnamese woman who fought to regain custody of her children after she unwittingly married a Korean man simply to become a surrogate mother for him and his former wife.
Gong-gam¡¯s efforts to educate activists, private sector lawyers, and the public on the importance of protecting and promoting human rights include events focused on the plight of migrant women. We recently organized and hosted training sessions and conferences for immigration activists on the special needs of migrant woman married to Korean nationals, domestic violence, and sexual harassment in the workplace.
International Marriage Brokers: As local authorities promoted so-called international marriages between Korean men and foreign women to address declining rural populations, the exploitative and discriminatory practices of international marriage brokers came to light. Gong-gam, after raising public awareness of local authorities¡¯ subsidies to marriage brokers, successfully urged the Korean government to introduce legislation in this area, resulting in the enactment of a law in 2008 to regulate the activities of international marriage brokers.
Family Registration System: Recently, the old family registration system in Korea (È£ÁÖÁ¦), in which only men could be the head of a household, was abolished. In its place, a new law concerning registration of family status was enacted to signify a new system of ID registration. However, under this new system, violation of privacy rights became evident with the unwanted release of personal information, such as records showing a previous divorce and remarriage, the existence of children born of a previous marriage, sex change status, adoptions that were intended to be kept secret, etc. Since prejudice and discrimination against divorced or remarried women, as well as single unmarried mothers, are still quite problematic in Korean society, these violations of privacy rights exacerbate their already precarious situation. Within this context, Gong-gam, in seeking to limit the release of personal information and to protect privacy rights, has worked together with women¡¯s groups, other human rights groups and lawmakers, to propose amendments to the law, to seek changes to the system, and to raise public awareness of the issues.
Acquittal for a female officer who was a victim of stalking
Obtaining an acquittal for a female officer who was a victim of stalking
In July, 2008, the Military High Court ruled on an appeal of a case against a female officer Captain A, a victim of stalking, based on allegations that Captain A had committed acts of insubordination, reversing the guilty verdict of the Military Trial Court and making a finding of not guilty on all charges. For this military trial, lawyers SeoYeon Jang, and HyeRyung Cha of Gonggam, lawyer JongIn Lim, and lawyer MinGyung Won, had formed a group to represent Captain A.
The Military High Court stated that the order given by Major B, the alleged stalker can not constitute a just order of a superior officer¡¯, a required element of insubordination under military penal law. The court acquitted Captain A for the reason that no evidence was found to support the charge of insubordination since the testimonies of key witnesses C and D, who were direct subordinates of Major B, which formed the evidence to convict Captain A by the Military Trial Court was found to lack credibility.
Fourteen human rights organizations, including Gonggam, formed a committee to support stalking victims in the military¡¯ to back Captain A, after her conviction by the Army Division Court and the Military Trial Court. Lawyer SeoYeon Jang and HyeRyung Cha of Gonggam represented Captain A during her appeal and were also active in committee activities.